Thank you Gerv

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

for answering my questions on SSL and bugzilla. I was unaware of the cookie protection scheme - thanks for pointing it out. I do very well understand your point on making confidential security bugs. Making mozilla more secure by not letting everybody read security bugs is a good thing.

The compagny I work for is a bank. I understand why they restrict the use of SSL, the reason is quite simple : with SSL enabled only for certain sites, security is increased. Nowdays most compagnies close all ports except http and https, so people tunnel everything thru those two ports. Hence If I use a tunnel to export data from the bank they'll be able to know what is exported. With SSL enabled, they can't.
I think I'll live without bugzilla access.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Thank you Gerv.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://perso.hirlimann.net/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/758

Leave a comment

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by ludo published on 24 septembre 2004 11h35.

Windows update, spyware etc .. was the previous entry in this blog.

La bête du Gévaudan is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Pages

View Ludovic Hirlimann's profile on LinkedIn
www.flickr.com
Powered by Movable Type 4.1