Thank you Gerv

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

for answering my questions on SSL and bugzilla. I was unaware of the cookie protection scheme - thanks for pointing it out. I do very well understand your point on making confidential security bugs. Making mozilla more secure by not letting everybody read security bugs is a good thing.

The compagny I work for is a bank. I understand why they restrict the use of SSL, the reason is quite simple : with SSL enabled only for certain sites, security is increased. Nowdays most compagnies close all ports except http and https, so people tunnel everything thru those two ports. Hence If I use a tunnel to export data from the bank they'll be able to know what is exported. With SSL enabled, they can't.
I think I'll live without bugzilla access.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://perso.hirlimann.net/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/758

Leave a comment

Recent Entries

Housse de camouflage pour objectifs
Lorsque j'ai écrit mon billet sur l'objectif Canon EF 400mm F/2.8, je pensais ajouter quelques accessoires à ma panoplie de…
Testers for Thunderbird 3.1b1 wanted
We are going to release Lanikai 3.1b1. I'm looking for volunteers to work on a complete test using litmus. These…
Fosdem 2010
Like every year since 2004, this year I attended Fosdem. Like last year Fosdem was half work half fun -…